JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 5, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant Leonel De Jesus Santa Santa·Respondent Eps Savia Salud Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Conflicto de competencia suscitado entre el Juzgado Laboral del Circuito de Rionegro (Antioquia) y el Juzgado Primero Promiscuo de Familia del Circuito de la misma ciudad.

El conflicto se originó en torno a las diferentes interpretaciones que hicieron los despachos judiciales involucrados del factor funcional.

Ellos presentaron una serie de argumentos relacionados con la interpretación del artículo 32 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, referentes al entendimiento de la expresión “superior jerárquico correspondiente”.

Considera la Corte que quien debe resolver la impugnación formulada contra el fallo proferido por el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de San Vicente Ferrer (Antioquia) es el Juzgado Primero Promiscuo de Familia del Circuito de Rionegro, a quien dispone enviar el expediente para que de manera inmediata adopte la decisión de fondo que corresponde.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. DEJAR SIN EFECTOS el Auto del 8 de junio de 2018 proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Promiscuo de Familia del Circuito de Rionegro (Antioquia) dentro del proceso de la referencia.
  3. Segundo. REMITIR el expediente ICC-3410 al Juzgado
  4. Primero. Promiscuo de Familia del Circuito de Rionegro (Antioquia) para que, de manera inmediata, tramite la impugnacion presentada por la EPS Savia Salud.
  5. Tercero. Por Secretaria General, COMUNICAR la decision adoptada en esta providencia al Juzgado Laboral del Circuito de Rionegro (Antioquia) y a las partes.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceAlberto Rojas Ríos
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.